“at large” precincts where one just has to say he works somewhere near + no voter ID requirement= Massive fraud capabilities in a general election. Think “river wards” of Chicago, 9the ward in New Orleans
I don’t know that this applies to the general election. This is the party primary rules here like the Iowa caucuses and others, it has latitude not granted under federal and state general election rules.
Whatever happened to the Dem. state party demand that those who caucus at the “at large” precincts submit photo ID?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1954068/posts
As I understand it, this rule only applies to the Democrat caucus in Nevada, and not to the general election. So your argument is not valid.
“at large” precincts where one just has to say he works somewhere near + no voter ID requirement= Massive fraud capabilities in a general election
Exactly my concern--that this is a Soros-manipulated strategy that seek to impact far beyond NV.