Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chimera

Thanks for the detail on it, but there is still a govt guarantee on top of the pool to make it work.

And how many billions of taxpayer dollars went into Yucca Mountain, which is a huge support to the industry?

I very much support Yucca Mountain and rapid development of nuke plants, btw. Just saying people ought not get up in arms that the PTC credit for wind energy is some huge pork check, or something way out of proportion compared to govt support in other areas of the energy industry.


50 posted on 01/18/2008 7:23:55 AM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Uncledave
And how many billions of taxpayer dollars went into Yucca Mountain, which is a huge support to the industry.

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1986 provided for industry-funding of the development of Yucca Mountain. The DOE collects a millage on every kwhr of nuclear-generated electricity to provide for waste management. There is no taxpayer funding. It is consumer-funded, but then again everything in our economy ultimately is funded by the consumer. It is also interesting that the nuclear industry is the only industry required by law to plan for it's own decommissioning and waste disposal. Coal-fired plants, gas turbines, windmills, solar panels, oil refineries, steel mills, factories, chemical plants, all of these other industries don't have the same requirements for decommissioning/waste disposal as the nuclear industry.

Here's another thing not a lot of people know: the nuclear industry pays essentially 100% of the cost for the government to regulate it. Essentially all of the NRC's budget is covered by licensing fees paid by licensees. The industry essentially pays for the "privilege" of being regulated by the government. I know that's not true of things like the broadcast industry (FCC fees don't cover the budget of the FCC), the airline industry (the FAA), and industries regulated by EPA. But it's interesting that the nuclear industry is singled out in this manner.

53 posted on 01/18/2008 8:06:11 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
FWIW I don’t have a problem per se with the government funding technology development. Reasonable people can disagree on the merits of the specific things that are funded, whether they are practical or have risks associated with eventual deployment in private ventures, etc. Many, many things we have today and take for granted have some aspect of development through public dollars. Aircraft and automotive industries, for example, as well as chemical processes, power production, even the computers we are all using right now, have some aspect of their development that likely can be traced to public or public/private partnership development.
54 posted on 01/18/2008 8:10:21 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson