[jmyrlefuller]

Again, folks, this is The New Republic we're talking about. I know Ron Paul's not exactly the most sane man, and this was the height of his bizarreness, but why didn't this come out and be addressed during his '88 Presidential campaign when it was still fresh?

How soon we forget the Scott Beauchamp story... something stinks.

[wideawake]

How soon we forget the Scott Beauchamp story

Scott Beauchamp had zero evidence to back up his claims.

This story has hard evidence: original editions of Ron Paul's newsletters archived at the University of Wisconsin and admitted by Ron paul to be his newsletter.

[steadfastconservative]

It may be The New Republic but that doesn’t change the fact that for several years Ron Paul published these newsletters and either did not know what was in them (which demonstrates negligence on his part) or knew and permitted them to published. Either way he is responsible for their content.