If Paul really was a Leftist why on earth is The New Republic trying to hard to destroy him?
You are suggesting that the newsletters, requested for years but access refused by Paul, are forgeries.
If you have evidence that they're forgeries, perhaps a plot by the Wisconsin Historical Society and the university in Kansas, you should present it, you'll have an impact and bring credit on FR for rooting out the facts, as another Freeper did when he posted newsletters months before the New Republic.
NewslettersRon Paul: US "military is mowing civilians down in the streets"
RON PAUL ACCUSED U.S. TROOPS OF WAR CRIMES IN DESERT STORM
Ron Paul: Israel bought Jesse Helms
Ron Paul: Traitor had direct line to President Reagan
Ron Paul: Clinton didn't cut defense enough
Ron Paul supported the PLO terrorists
Of course this leaves you with the problem of why Ron Paul would put out such a weak explanation over forgeries.
If they're not forgeries, he's stuck with them, and the messenger isn't the issue.
Obviously people can come to their own conclusions about the content. I think they're racist, Ron Paul seems to agree with me, but others may not.