Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: greyfoxx39

I don’t know what you mean by “jump on this with all guns blazing”. I hardly think I have to defend Rush Limbaugh here against charges that he would somehow change his message because of who owns Clear Channel.

But I will be glad when some sanity returns here. I didn’t know there was an entire thread where people questioned if conservative talk show hosts were telling the truth or not based on some capital management firm investing in a company that provides the stations which air their shows.

Anyway, right now I’m trying to clear the path for Thompson as much as possible, so there’s no excuses in the way of Victory on Saturday in South Carolina. If that means going easy on the wild theories being floated, I can live with it.


274 posted on 01/17/2008 4:23:20 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Actually, what it would mean is a break in your non-stop shilling for Mitt...that would be a nice surprise. I could certainly live with THAT. ;)


276 posted on 01/17/2008 4:30:07 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (Mitt willingly gives up his personal freedoms to his church..why would he protect YOURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson