The one he was originally busted for was an Olympic Arms that malfunctioned while someone else was shooting it. His machining 80% business was actually one of the better outfits out there and entirely above board. No charges have been filed against him for any of those rifles.
Learn something before you make yourself sound any more ignorant...
You're referenceing the wrong case and referring to Olofson. THe gun was not an Olympic Arms piece, that's why the history of the gun wasn't allowed in court. The gun in question was modified by Olofson, who rendered the piece a machine gun. As the court docs and testimony document, Olofson told the student not to use the unmarked position, because it might fire off 3 rnds. That means Olofson was aware the gun he loaned the student would function as a machine gun.
Sure "His machining 80% business was actually one of the better outfits out there and entirely above board. "
No.
"Learn something before you make yourself sound any more ignorant..."
Yeah, do that.