Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
"Actually, no it didn't. The first report on it was that it wouldn't fully engage in the Full auto position. "

See the link in #16. The genius professor told the student not to use the unmarked position 3, because it might fire off 3 rnds. The student placed the switch in the unmarked position at the range, and it did fire off 3 rnds before jamming. The ATF found that position 3 would consistently fire of 20 rnd mags at full auto.

"It was only on subsequent abuse by the BATFE that they finally broke it the rest of the way and got it to go into a "wild fire" mode where the sear catch was completely broken off. ...The government is up to no good on this one."

Yeah, sure.

"This was literally a malfunction that was then blown out of proportion by the Feds."

Not according to the discussion between Olofson and the "student" when the gun was loaned out, or according to the gun's performance at the range, or the findings from the lab.

30 posted on 01/17/2008 11:30:43 AM PST by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
The ATF found that position 3 would consistently fire of 20 rnd mags at full auto.

Read the whole thread over at ARFCOM.

Also, if we had something like the historical Second Amendment, this wouldn't be a big deal. It'd just be some tinkerer with a malfunctioning rifle.

(sarc)Thanks for sticking up for the government though. I'm sure they're happy to have people like you defending their unConstitutional actions.(/sarc)

32 posted on 01/17/2008 11:34:06 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson