I didn’;t link to naythign for the rebuttle- so enough with the lame old tired out phrases Coyoteman- There was no need to link to anythign else because the lecture was nothign but a slieght of hand one trick pony show- Therei s NOTHING random about ingeneau- it is all worked out ahead of time, starting points are given with informations already inplace, and ready to react to a new set of instructions when they come passing by. As well, the Proff. completely ignores where all the informations came from to start with, and his Johnny come lately ‘random’ program is nothign but random and has been soundly refuted in many forums- not just ‘christian’ ones.
[[The stuff you link to, almost entirely gleaned from creationist or creation “science” websites, does not pertain to real science at all, let alone rebut any of it.]]
You’ve YET to show how any of what I do post fro msites isn’t lgiti science- Saying it aint don’t make it so Coyoteman- you’ve got to do more than stomp your foot and insist- you’ve got to actually do a little bit of work and actually address issues- not run from them screaming that they aint ligit.
I have read several of these so-called “rebuttals,” and in the vast majority of cases they leave the scientific issues untouched. They restate the creationist position but never show any errors in their opponents’ methods or conclusions—except to say the conclusions can’t be right because, well, they just can’t! Being the last one to speak is not the same thing as a successful rebuttal.