Three Words:
Piltdown Man Hoax.
Still defended by the most ardent Evolutionist Zealots..
Still defended by the most ardent Evolutionist Zealots
Not correct. Many researchers recognized early on that Piltdown didn't fit. The geology was picked on by about 1915. Friedrichs and Weidenreich had both, by about 1932, published their research suggesting the lower jaws and molars were that of an orang (they were correct). By then most scholars were ignoring Piltdown entirely because it didn't fit with the newer South African finds. Only a few British anthropologists (likely for reasons of national pride) still bought into Piltdown at that time.
But if you have evidence that some "ardent Evolutionist Zealots" are still defending Piltdown, I am sure you would be willing to post it for us.
But i guess facts don’t matter when you’ve created your own reality.