“The problems with Darwinism as a “theory” are mathematical and biochemical.”
Please tell me you aren’t talking about irreducibility.
Essentially the anti-evolutionist argument of irreducibility is just another discredited myth. People simply want to believe that something mystical and nondisprovable and beyond human comprehension is going on, when it simply isn’t.
No, am not. For Darwin’s “random variation” to be taken seriously nowadays it has to be defined on the biochemical - physical chemistry level. Darwin thought cells would prove to be in essence what he thought he saw when looking at thin slices of cork bark.