Words alone don't make it so.
Mike Huckabee is divisive in an already divided nation. I can’t see him being an effective leader when he gets to Washington. He’s already “flip-flopped” on two issues in the last two days. Now, if many Republicans are calling Mitt Romney a flip-flopper for decisions reached a few years ago, what would they call Mike Huckabee, pandering state to state for whatever folks want to hear.
I appreciate his wit and humor and think he is a wonderful pastor, or would be if he chose to lead a congregation again, but as president, he would not be what I’m looking for. I think Huckabee is an abbreviation for “a nation divided against itself cannot stand.”
The two are virtually identical.
Me cauliflower IQ will be taxed to its extreme having to evaluate whether casting a vote for Giuliani's 50%, Romney's 48%, McPain's 45%, Huckaphoney's 40% or Paul's 28% agreement with my ideologies outweighs my detesting the 92% that Shrillery doesn't agree with me (and the Witch is at the top of the list with respect to the opposition).
A choice between Hunter's 80% & Thompson's 67% is to this cauliflower IQ a no-brainer.