[1rudeboy]

This counts as a victory for Johnny Sutton, until someone arrives to explain otherwise. [chuckle]

[SwinneySwitch]

Ping!

If you want on, or off this S. Texas/Mexico ping list, please FReepMail me.

[Hazcat]

No problem..issue everyone a passport and put the fence on the NORTH side of their city!

[rednesss]

"Several landowners have given the government access to their land, including some who oppose the fence. Many others in Texas, Arizona and California have refused, prompting the lawsuits."

It would seem that catering to law breakers is a lucrative business to put up such a fight. I say build a fence around these people's property and that will funnel all of the border crossing traffic over their land which shouldn't take long to completely destroy.

[Muleteam1]

Ah yes, the ever heavy hand of Big Gubmint on a poor little community.

[mtbopfuyn]

Wow, court ruled public lands can be used as access by the federal government temporarily. Well, duh. It’s public land for goodness sakes. I agree, if someone raises a stink then build the fence on the north side of their property however, don’t bother issuing a passport as they’ve already declared which side they’re on.

[gubamyster]

ping

[azhenfud]

“We have not denied them access (to county property),” the judge said. “We just have not replied (to a recent letter from the Corps of Engineers demanding the county sign a document granting permission to enter county land).

Obviously a failure to reply does not constitute a right to not comply.

[wolfcreek]

Cameron County Judge Carlos Cascos said the county must cooperate with the federal government, “IT’S THE LAW OF THE LAND”

DAMN, he gets it.