"Aspirations of citizenship" even if IT'S NOT EASY, is still AMNESTY....that was McCain-Kennedy Bush version of amnesty, which defeated TWICE last summer!
This is EXACTLY why we cannot trust the Johnny come lately (on immigration) candidates who now claim to be hawks on the border issue. They have already proven what they will do once in office.
All forms of AMNESTY (aspirations of citizenship for law-breakers) and those who support it, MUST BE DEFEATED...even if its not easy! Anyone who supports amnesty is aiding and abbetting criminals in the act of a FELONY!
Here's another quote from Mr. 'Aspirations of Citizenship' FRed Thompson....
"Nobody's advocating that these people all be rounded up. Nobody's advocating that they even be arrested and incarcerated, although they're in violation of the law"...
When is this guy going to get a clue....anything short of DEPORTATION and following the law is AMNESTY.
Okay...I did not support it, but they were going to be fined under that bill:
Each alien would have to pay a $1,000 "penalty" and $2,000 in fees for the temporary Z visa, pass a background check, and submit proof of employment and fingerprints. The American Immigration Lawyers Association calculates that for a family of four the total in fees and penalties for Z visas could reach $9,000, including fees for "derivative" applicants such as spouses and children. And after an initial four-year period, the bill requires additional processing fees for renewal, which the AILA figures could amount to $6,000 more.
So your argument on that is moot. As that website states "calling the fines and fees "amnesty" doesn't fit the dictionary definition of the term".
When is this guy going to get a clue....anything short of DEPORTATION and following the law is AMNESTY.
Considering your link there was to the law on deportation, I take it you are a "deport them all" supporter. No wonder you don't agree with Fred, he's trying to deal with reality. Again, your logic defies reality.