A cellphone doesn’t have a GPS receiver (for picking up location signals from GPS satellites) unless it is specifically built into the telephone. Adding GPS usually adds significantly to the cellphone’s cost. Further, a GPS receiver doesn't emit a signal (to triangulate on), it just receives ones that are already in the air and computes its location using timing differences from the multiple satellites it “sees” overhead. GPS is superior to the cellphone triangulation method because the likelihood of getting three or more GPS satellite signals is very high due to the extensive coverage in geosynchronous orbits around the Earth and because the calculation algorithm used in determining location is fairly precise.
Pitt said their cellphones didn’t have the GPS capability. Since he was one of the two lost hikers, maybe you should believe him.
GPS satellites are not in geosynchronous orbits, they are in low Earth polar orbits, and their accuracy is not as good as triangulating from cell towers can potentially be. A few years ago a special geosynchronous WAAS satellite was added that sends out a correction signal. This information is computed by land stations that know their exact location and compare it to their GPS calculated location, which is usually in error. The gravity of the Earth is not uniform and the GPS satellite positions vary constantly from their predicted positions.
Rather than just timing signals a system could be implemented to measure the phase of a radio wave when it hits. This would improve the accuracy down to a tiny fraction of an inch. Some very precise surveying equipment uses this technique.