Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Was it not conservative to amend the Constitution so that black folks were no longer a fraction of white folks? I'm not getting where you are coming from.

At the time, no it wasn't. Politically, "conservative" generally means opposed to or approaching change with some degree of trepidation. As it stands, questions of marriage and abortion are (or if the 10th Amendment were held to, would be) the pervue of the States. This is a tacit assertion that the States should not be trusted with those decisions.

56 posted on 01/15/2008 6:41:42 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
At the time, no it wasn't.

Nonsense.

This is the founding principle of our Republic and the aim should be to preserve, conserve if you prefer, just that:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

58 posted on 01/15/2008 6:47:58 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson