Yes, your point is correct and well-taken. As laws they would be unconstitutional, as amendments they obviously would not.
Thank you.
“As laws they would be unconstitutional...”
Wrong again, 4vr.
A law defining marriage as only between one man and one woman would not be “unconstitutional” either, except in the legal fantasyland that apparently exists in your own mind.
In fact, about 45 states have such laws on the books, plus over two dozen states with new constitutional amendments that say the same thing.
Huckabee merely proposes amending the U.S. Constitution to ensure that the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t overturn all those state laws and amendments by declaring that they’ve discovered a constitutional “right” to homosexual marriage or polygamy.
Better try again...