Sure seems like it to me. If changing it is "conservative", what's there to conserve?
The Constitution describes the amendment process. The founders were smart guys. There is nothing inherently unconservative about amending the constitution. See the Bill of Rights, amendments all.
If changing [the Constitution] is "conservative", what's there to conserve?
Conservative is when you restrict yourself to amending the Constitution by constitutional means . . . rather than by simply declaring that the Constitution means whatever you find convenient.