Replies

Every school kid knows that the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion but keeps the Church and State distinctly separate.

Well you being a school kid and all perhaps you could show me where in the Constitution a citizens motivations for amending the Constitution are unconstitional?

So why don't you dispense with the insults and emotionally cacophonous hysteria and explain why the inclusion of "God's Standards" as defined by Gov Huckabee is not unconstitutional if it espouses such partisan, religious points of view?

I already did, you just don't have the wherewithal to understand that. Not my problem. But your vocabulary is impressive!

I take it that your view of America is that only secular motivations are sufficient for government actors to move legislation or the amendment process. Is that your position? The signers of the DOI would be astounded at that view but, what the heck, it's a free country.

Well you being a school kid and all perhaps you could show me where in the Constitution a citizens' motivations for amending the Constitution are unconstitional?

There are indeed no Constitutional constraints on the citizens motivations for wanting to amend the Constitution. It is, however politically oxymoronic to claim doing it is "conservative".

Despite trying to engage you in an intellectually-honest exchange,it seems you have neither the desire nor capacity to convey anything but for what seems impressive to no one but yourself.

I should know better not to respond to anything you post in the future.