You have confused "implied" with "inferred" when you butted into a conversation between me and someone else.
I have already explained what I meant to you at least twice and yet you still ask the same question so, yes, the term Blockhead is appropriate.
If a majority of vets oppose the mission in Iraq, as you once again appear to be insinuating, ...
This is a great example of how you have your ideas of what you want to believe that I'm saying when I'm not saying that at all. But you're so stuck on it that you can't understand simple English explanations.
That is called being "Stuck on Stupid".
So if you REALLY want to find out what OIF vets think, find some and talk to them, don't rely on what you read that they thing and don't rely on what FR or DU wishes that they think.
“when you butted into a conversation between me and someone else.”
That wasn’t a private reply. You shouldn’t tell people to ‘STFU’ for simply replying to your posts and disagreeing with your statements.
” have already explained what I meant to you at least twice “
No you haven’t. You gave me instruction. You did not explain what you ‘inferred’.
“This is a great example of how you have your ideas of what you want to believe that I’m saying when I’m not saying that at all.”
Once again you dodged any kind of explanation for your previous statement. You had claimed ‘I think I’ve seen enough and talked with enough vets to have a good idea of what this is about.’ I asked you to elaborate on this statement and you didn’t. Nor were you willing to explain the high re-enlistment rates regarding Iraq.