If we blamed Mitt for this, there would be no candidate left.
All of them are successful in private life. As long as his association ended in 2001, that is good enough for me.
I would be more worried about a person that has lived off the taxpayers for a number of years.
Now you're just descending into conspiratorial moonbattery.
Its not about ownership, its about influence.
Oh please. That is ridiculous. It is not his fault the company bought this media. And if the media gives Mitt good press well then I guess it is good on Mitt but still does not prove anything. I guess the other candidates had the option to start a company from nothing and make it a multi-million dollar corporation too but they did not go that direction so really their loss.