[JohnBovenmyer]

Also Mitt beat Hillary, by 10,000 votes, and the only candidate she had with whom to divide Democrat votes was McCain.

[JohnBovenmyer]

Mitt’s margin of victory over McCain, based on CNN’s count at 100% voting is 9.26%, which is larger than the 5.63% McCain beat him in NH (from CNN) and is actually larger than the 9.18% Huck beat him by in Iowa (latter based on the 100% tally that finally showed up in the Des Moines Register a few days later), larger than the 7.83% Obama beat Silky by in Iowa and even the 8.11% he beat Hillary by in Iowa. If the media continues to ignore Mitt’s even bigger win in WY this the largest win of any candidate in any press covered state, unless you count Hillary’s win over uncommitted today (somehow I doubt she’s bragging about that one.) Yet McCain was expected to win this by the MSM. Will they act surprised and have polling mea culpas like they did after Hillary won NH?

[JohnBovenmyer]

Mitt’s margin of victory over McCain, based on CNN’s count at 100% voting is 9.26%, which is larger than the 5.63% McCain beat him in NH (from CNN) and is actually larger than the 9.18% Huck beat him by in Iowa (latter based on the 100% tally that finally showed up in the Des Moines Register a few days later), larger than the 7.83% Obama beat Silky by in Iowa and even the 8.11% he beat Hillary by in Iowa. If the media continues to ignore Mitt’s even bigger win in WY this the largest win of any candidate in any press covered state, unless you count Hillary’s win over uncommitted today (somehow I doubt she’s bragging about that one.) Yet McCain was expected to win this by the MSM. Will they act surprised and have polling mea culpas like they did after Hillary won NH?