Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan, Vote for Romney
The Corner ^ | 1/15/08 | K Lo/ M. Levin

Posted on 01/15/2008 10:44:23 AM PST by Dawnsblood

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: arturo
Isn’t it interesting that one claiming to be a conservative would advise Michigan voters to vote for Romney

Romney's the only one who can derail McCain there... makes sense for the time being.

21 posted on 01/15/2008 11:46:08 AM PST by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

I guess the only question I have at this point is... did anyone on this thread bother to listen to the case Mr. Levin made or do people feel qualified to remark on it in ignorance?


22 posted on 01/15/2008 11:49:17 AM PST by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/BenShapiro/2005/08/17/why_the_chickenhawk_argument_is_un-american_part_i

Why the ‘Chickenhawk’ argument is un-American

Excerpt:

Who is qualified to speak on matters of national security? According to the American left, only pacifists, military members who have served in combat and direct relatives of those slain in combat or in acts of terrorism. The rest of us — about 80 percent of voters — must simply sit by silently. Our opinions do not matter. You want disenfranchisement? Talk to the political left, which seeks to exclude the vast majority of the American populace from the national debate about foreign policy.

The bulk of the left in this country refuses to argue about foreign policy rationally, without resorting to ad hominem attack. The favored ad hominem attack of the left these days is “chickenhawk.” The argument goes something like this: If you believe in any of the wars America is currently fighting, you must join the military. If you do not, you must shut up. If, on the other hand, you believe that America should disengage from all foreign wars, you may feel free not to serve in the military.


23 posted on 01/15/2008 11:53:10 AM PST by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Does anyone here know what promises were made to Massachusetts voters when Romney ran for governor? If so, did he deliver on those promises?

I’m more concerned about whether he was able to deliver on his promises. To me, that is a bigger issue than if he has changed his views to run for president. I’m more concerned whether he has the integrity to FOLLOW THROUGH or not.


24 posted on 01/15/2008 11:55:11 AM PST by davandbar (CLINTONThere's no limit to how much credit a man can get, if he doesn't care what he's actually done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: preacher

You have a good point, but Meandog’s anger towards the way Hannity has been tearing down McCain is certainly legit, especially if Meandog himself is a vet.

Besides, Hannity tears down McCain for being a RINO, but when two good conservatives are in the race (Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson), rather than getting behind one of those guys, he goes in the tank with his man-crush for another RINO, Rudy Giuliani.


25 posted on 01/15/2008 12:02:21 PM PST by conservativecajun (Hunter '08 - vote for the most qualified for the position)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meandog

“Mark Levin is a chickenhawk just like his buddy Sean...IMO”

Speaking as one who has served my glorious Marine Corps and fought in combat, I find your remarks absolutely ridiculous. How can non service in the military disqualify you from debating National Security? Does that also mean that if you are not a woman, then you are disqualified taking a stance on abortion?


26 posted on 01/15/2008 12:02:26 PM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Your slander of Mark Levin is ridiculous.

As to John McCain - he voted against permanently barring gang members and terrorists from the US, appears unstable, and reminds me of the Manchurian Candidate.

27 posted on 01/15/2008 12:06:54 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: davandbar
“I’m more concerned about whether he was able to deliver on his promises. To me, that is a bigger issue than if he has changed his views to run for president. I’m more concerned whether he has the integrity to FOLLOW THROUGH or not.”

Whichever Republican is nominated, he can have all the integrity in the world, he can have never changed his views (which I would suspect is unreasonable — I know mine have evolved with knowledge) and purpose in his heart to follow through at all costs, but he may still wind up with bupkus. For the evangelicals among you, even our Lord had a tough sell with the Pharisees and Sadducees. He’d have had to drag them into the Kingdom clawing and kicking. Once there, they’d have wanted to turn around and go back.

I want someone with more foreign policy experience. I want someone with major business credentials. I want someone who isn’t crazy enough to call the Ambassador from the Middle East “Jerks”. I want someone who is able to walk his position through Congress. I see the only viable ticket (unfortunately Hunter can’t get traction) as Romney/Thompson. Thompson has got to get hold of the Congress and start making sense of the mess there. Nancy Pelosi needs more to do than change the items on the cafeteria menus.

28 posted on 01/15/2008 12:08:12 PM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: davandbar
I’m more concerned about whether he was able to deliver on his promises.

You should be EVEN MORE CONCERNED on what McCain has already 'delivered' through CFR, his opposition to tax-cuts, amnesty legislation and pro-Kyoto rhetoric. I don't relish a Romney nomination... but I dread our future if it's McCainiac or Huckleberry.

29 posted on 01/15/2008 12:11:00 PM PST by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

McCain belongs to the radical left when it comes to immigration and he is a liberal on many other issues. The mystery is why are any Republicans even voting for him. And he has mental issues. I would like to know more why he and his son are not even talking to each other.


30 posted on 01/15/2008 12:13:09 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

The only two choices are Romney and Thompson.


31 posted on 01/15/2008 12:14:55 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

LEVIN DID NOT SAY HE SUPPORTS ROMNEY RIGHT NOW, HE SAID TO VOTE FOR HIM IN THE MICHIGAN PRIMARY TO STOP MCCAIN AND HUCKABEE. LISTEN TO THE DAMN THING.


32 posted on 01/15/2008 12:16:35 PM PST by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

That’s how my family views it too.


33 posted on 01/15/2008 12:17:37 PM PST by mcshot (Missing my grade school desk which protected from nuclear blasts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: meandog

You are a brain-dead lib fool. McCain wants to give rights to terrorists. You don’t have to have served to know that is nuts.


34 posted on 01/15/2008 12:20:38 PM PST by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
I guess the only question I have at this point is... did anyone on this thread bother to listen to the case Mr. Levin made or do people feel qualified to remark on it in ignorance?

The commenters so far are mostly those who drank their own kool aide long ago.

35 posted on 01/15/2008 12:20:59 PM PST by LexBaird (Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
I listened to all of it and still think conservatives should cast their votes for the conservative. No one knows how much of the vote Fred Thompson can garner unless they stop listening to naysayers, stop playing games with Romney supporters who will NOT fore go a vote for their man in SC to return the favor, stop believing the polls designed to manipulate the outcome, and just vote for conservatism in this race.

It's snowing and turnout may not be strong. Fred supporters may manage a surprising showing which would help him tremendously in SC on Saturday.

36 posted on 01/15/2008 12:21:51 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Route66

Fred didn’t campaign in Michigan. Why is that?


37 posted on 01/15/2008 12:22:53 PM PST by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

Thanks Sir. FANTASTIC, impassioned show last night. Thanks for your awesome work.


38 posted on 01/15/2008 12:23:59 PM PST by NYC Republican (Fred's Done, Hunter was DOA. Romney's the Most Conservative ELECTABLE candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: meandog

There are plenty of vets and active duty who oppose McCain. You jerk.


39 posted on 01/15/2008 12:25:14 PM PST by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

Thanks for clarifying, oh Great One...:) I, for one, appreciate accuracy.

And, I agree, whether one’s ultimate candidate is Romney or Thompson or Giuliani, MCCAIN MUST BE STOPPED.


40 posted on 01/15/2008 12:25:55 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Psalm 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson