Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rusty millet
All very good points. However, if you take the time to read Duesberg’s paper closely, I think you will find that all these anomalies are addressed and answered. What’s unfortunate in regards to the AIDS debate is that very few people are willing or feel qualified to take the time to sort these issues out.
47 posted on 01/15/2008 9:13:12 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
However, if you take the time to read Duesberg’s paper closely, I think you will find that all these anomalies are addressed and answered.

Sorry - the issues I raised are not in there. I am responding to the gentleman in the original article who has a medical condition and is complaining that his 73 year old self is not reacting well to medication. Not really sure what you are attempting to say through all this discussion. Have a blessed day!
60 posted on 01/15/2008 9:49:16 AM PST by rusty millet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
All very good points. However, if you take the time to read Duesberg’s paper closely, I think you will find that all these anomalies are addressed and answered. What’s unfortunate in regards to the AIDS debate is that very few people are willing or feel qualified to take the time to sort these issues out.

Very few people, except for the entire medical community and research community worldwide, all whom have looked at Duesberg's "evidence" and all (except a TINY minority) of whom rejected Duesberg's theories more than a decade ago.

Repeatedly posting long discredited scientific theories on a political website will not make them true.

jas3
98 posted on 01/15/2008 12:17:52 PM PST by jas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson