To: rusty millet
All very good points. However, if you take the time to read Duesberg’s paper closely, I think you will find that all these anomalies are addressed and answered. What’s unfortunate in regards to the AIDS debate is that very few people are willing or feel qualified to take the time to sort these issues out.
To: GodGunsGuts
However, if you take the time to read Duesbergs paper closely, I think you will find that all these anomalies are addressed and answered.
Sorry - the issues I raised are not in there. I am responding to the gentleman in the original article who has a medical condition and is complaining that his 73 year old self is not reacting well to medication. Not really sure what you are attempting to say through all this discussion. Have a blessed day!
To: GodGunsGuts
All very good points. However, if you take the time to read Duesbergs paper closely, I think you will find that all these anomalies are addressed and answered. Whats unfortunate in regards to the AIDS debate is that very few people are willing or feel qualified to take the time to sort these issues out.
Very few people, except for the entire medical community and research community worldwide, all whom have looked at Duesberg's "evidence" and all (except a TINY minority) of whom rejected Duesberg's theories more than a decade ago.
Repeatedly posting long discredited scientific theories on a political website will not make them true.
jas3
98 posted on
01/15/2008 12:17:52 PM PST by
jas3
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson