Replies

Sorry jas3, I will not be responding to you anymore other than to point out that you refuse to debate Duesberg. You are free to post whatever you like, but I will not be responding to it. I find you dishonest, and I can’t stand people who go running to the moderators every time they encounter someone they disagree with. Goodbye, and good riddens.

Yes, I refuse to give any credibility to Duesberg or any other Conspiracy Theorists in a formal debate. That goes for you too. You'll not find any scientists who are willing to debate Duesberg for the same reason no Republicans will debate David Duke.

However I will absolutely continue to counter each and every falsehood that you post on Free Republic with the actual truth. For example every time you claim that HIV isn't infectious, I will counter that falsehood. Every time you claim that AZT is a DNA end chain terminator, I will point out to you that it is actually a reverse-transcriptase inhibitor.

In the last thread I posted 61 different instances of your dishonesty, none of which you challenged. Your response was that you wouldn't read it.

You also confessed that you have no qualifications or relevant training to make any judgement on the science HIV/AIDS, except that you were once an intern for a Congressman.

You also confessed that you don't read scientific journals and were unfamiliar with any recent work on HIV/AIDS. You said that you don't read Science, or Nature, or have a subscription to PubMed.

You don't read JAMA or NEJAMA nor do you have any information whatsoever on the efficacy of HAART treatments.

Lastly the phrase you wanted was "good riddance" not "good riddens" which has no meaning (but is highly indicative of the level of your written language skills).

jas3