Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Something I heard yesterday that makes me furious.

...In 2000, McCain lost Michigan by a huge margin among Republicans, who favored then-candidate George Bush by more than a 2 to 1 margin. By contrast, McCain won big among independent voters, winning two-thirds of them, and even bigger among Democrats who chose to vote in the Republican primary.

At the end of the day in 2000, McCain won Michigan by about eight points, breathing life back into his campaign temporarily...

from http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/14/now_replaying_michigan_indepen.html


11 posted on 01/15/2008 5:45:48 AM PST by McGruff (A "Big Time" Fred Thompson supporter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: McGruff

While I respect the man for his service to our country, McCain’s candidacy has always been a Democrat creation. This election cycle is no exception. I think the Dems realize that they might have problems with their eventual nominee, so forcing a McCain nomination upon the Republicans will ensure that a Democrat (at heart anyway) wins the election either way.


14 posted on 01/15/2008 5:53:01 AM PST by Mygirlsmom (Who cares who does Hillie's hair---see her cry when you ask her where she gets her HSUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Now that’s ridiculous, and just shows why only party members should be allowed to vote in the primaries. The REPUBLICAN nominee should be determined by REPUBLICANS (and similarly, the DEMOCRAT nominee should be determined by DEMOCRATS.)


17 posted on 01/15/2008 6:04:09 AM PST by Zero Sum (Liberalism: The damage ends up being a thousand times the benefit! (apologies to Rabbi Benny Lau))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson