To: Flintlock
The relatives identified the gun as belonging to Vince’s father. Don’t continue to tell a lie. There’s enough evidence to involve the clintons without it.
14 posted on
01/15/2008 5:21:38 AM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA - Hunter '08)
To: Shooter 2.5
Since waterboarding can’t hurt you, we should do it to the Clintons so we can find out who killed Vince Foster
21 posted on
01/15/2008 5:34:39 AM PST by
IrishMike
(Liberalism is Jihad from within)
To: Shooter 2.5
Shooter, have you seen the Discovery Channel special “Unsolved History: JFK Beyond the Magic Bullet”? In the show, they recreate the positions of Connally, JFK, and Oswald and replicate both the path and wounds of the single bullet using artificial torsos that mimic flesh and bones. The bullet surfers more deformation only because it struck two ribs rather than one. If you have not seen it, do so. I watched it this past weekend.
To: Shooter 2.5
The relatives identified the gun as belonging to Vince Foster's father.False! No one in the Foster family ever id'd that gun as belonging to anyone in the family. Nor were any Foster fingerprints found on it. (See Amborose Evans-Pritchard's book, The Secret Life of Bill Clinton, published by Regnery in 1997).
To: Shooter 2.5
The relatives identified the gun as belonging to Vinces father. Relatives didn't want to find out where Ft Marcy Park was located.
To: Shooter 2.5
I could be wrong and you’re probably better informed but it was my understanding that his wife could not recall such a gun but that Foster had brought a differently colored handgun to DC from Arkansas. I don’t believe she had seen it for some time and MAY have been LED to identify it as his.
132 posted on
01/16/2008 9:46:41 AM PST by
Doc Savage
(The tree of liberty needs to be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson