Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377
And I'm not going to be associated with Fred Thompson by people who'd love nothing more than to claim he's being backed by someone who's abused a woman.

Profoundly sorry, Darkwolf, but you must admit the sentence above is just a little bit, um, impenetrable.

No harm meant.

What did you actually mean to say?

20 posted on 01/14/2008 11:36:27 PM PST by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: JennysCool
Interesting how instead of replying to my last post, you had to back up to one you already answered.

My sentence made perfect sense in context. I'll type slowly:

You suggested my personal life wasn't perfect, as if that were the issue with Moriarty. In fact, the issue is that Moriarty was arrested for hitting a woman.

Following so far?

*I*--DW--am not going to be associated with Fred Thompson by people who'd love nothing more than to claim he's--Fred's--being backed by someone who's abused a woman--Moriarty.

A complex sentence, sure. But perfectly acceptable grammatically, and perfectly understandable to anyone with eighth-grade-level reading comprehension. Unless you're trying to dodge the issue.

Class dismissed.

24 posted on 01/14/2008 11:43:39 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist who will vote Fred in the primary, Republican in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson