[mbraynard]

Is it a little odd that despite what he wrote and despite what he has says, because you can point to a few pro-life votes it means that Thompson is pro-life, but you can't do the same thing for Mitt Romney? I mean - we have it in Fred's own handwriting - handwriting he pretends to have forgotten, along with lobbying he doesn't remember.

I guess he really is trying to be like Reagan but not in the right ways.

[HerrBlucher]

You can lie and deny all you want but Fred’s pro-life record speaks for itself, that is why most of the major pro-life groups have endorsed Fred and not mitt juan or huck.

In the case of Mitt, here is one reason he has not been endorsed by pro-life groups:

KEY ASPECTS OF ROMNEY’S MASSACHUSETTS HEALTH CARE PLAN...

(1) Guarantees Planned Parenthood A Seat At The Table. Romney’s legislation created an advisory board and guarantees, by law, that Planned Parenthood has a seat at the table. Romney’s plan established a MassHealth payment policy advisory board, and one member of the Board must be from Planned Parenthood. No pro-life organization is represented. (Chapter 58 Section 3 (q) Section 16M (a), http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw06/sl060058.htm )

(2) Provides Taxpayer-Funded Abortions . Abortions are covered in the Commonwealth Care program that Romney created as Governor. Under the program, abortions are available for a copay of $50. (Menu of Health Care Services: http://www.mass.gov/Qhic/docs/cc_benefits1220_pt234.pdf )

Got that? NO PRO LIFE GROUP INCLUDED AND $50 ABORTIONS, no wonder they don’t like Mitt and will not endorse him.