You new to politics? Thompson correctly disdains the ridiculous notion of amending the Constitution. (If you believe that’s possible, you believe in the tooth fairy.) He is correctly focused on appointing justices who will do what is very possible: overturn Roe v. Wade. Then the states will be free to quickly take care of business on their own.
And Romney? Who cares what that liberal Massachusetts flip-flopper has to say?
He is completely untrustworthy.
Right. And I oppose that position on Abortion - I want a human life amendment - and at least someone who supports it. Romney does, Fred does not.
I suppose that would have put you and Fred on the other side of Lincoln during the Civil War when we amended the constution then. That's ok - I realize you really agree with me, you're just in the tank for 1% Fred.
“He is correctly focused on appointing justices who will do what is very possible: overturn Roe v. Wade. Then the states will be free to quickly take care of business on their own.”
In spite of my favorite candidate’s viewpoint, I’m more with Thompson on this one. I think adding Amendments is the wrong way to go about much of this stuff - and near impossible to achieve.
Here’s a few fun ones:
1893: Renaming this nation the United States of the Earth.
1933: Limit personal wealth to $1 million dollars
1971: American citizens should have the alienable right to an environment free of pollution.