Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbraynard
The answer is because they picked wrong, like most people on FR, and didn't recognize that 1% Fred doesn't take them as seriously as he takes them.

Yeah, they also got him wrong by giving him a 100% rating for his service in the Senate over two terms. BTW, while Fred has gotten a 100% rating, Mitt has, in his own words, "strongly supported a woman's right to choose".

If you insist on being a single-issue voter, you should at least educate yourself a bit. Mitt has changed his pro-life/pro-choice 'principles' several times.

100 posted on 01/15/2008 6:34:58 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Bob
He doesn't have a 100% rating from tne NRLC. Maybe you should check your facts. You're wrong on this, you are also wrong on Fred being pro-life.

Anyway, we are just wasting time discussing him. After Saturday we may as well be discussing Alan Keyes, and he actually is pro-life and for free speech, unlike 1% Fred.

107 posted on 01/15/2008 4:22:41 PM PST by mbraynard (Fred Thompson: Running a Strong Second to Dennis Kucinich (3,845 versus 2,808 in NH))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson