Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lormand

Bull.

He was about cutting government to the bone. In his mind that meant cutting the military too. That’s where he and I differed. I would’ve gone along with the military cuts IF he first proved to me he was going to do the other cuts first, and then win the war on terror...THEN CUT THE MILITARY. I’d be fine with that. I’d give him his first 4 year term to make good on his promises...win the war, cut the government to the bone, fix the trade imbalance, secure our borders...then if he succeeded I’d give him 4 more years to do his military cuts.

But that’s not what he wanted to do. He wanted to start out by cutting the military. THat’s a deal breaker for me. WHat we’d end up with is spending up the wazoo, unsecured borders, losing the war on terror, worsened trade imbalance, and NO MILITARY. Not a good situation. No ronpaul for me, thank you.


80 posted on 01/14/2008 3:33:16 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre
"He was about cutting government to the bone. In his mind that meant cutting the military too."

Bull?

What is the first thing he talks about cutting? The Military!

Why?

Because he is an anti-war suicide monkey.

99 posted on 01/14/2008 3:44:29 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - The Hemorrhoids of American Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson