Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lormand

And just what is it YOU are trying to conserve? From where I sit, it sure is NOT the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the Republic for which they stand. Nor is it smaller government, vastly smaller taxation and spending. Nor protecting the linchpin of ALL our God-given rights, the Second Amendment. Nor securing our borders. Nor even fighting the war against Jihadist terrorists. So what ARE you trying to conserve besides your so-called “Party?” Not principles, apparently. If you are willing to cast votes for Rudy McJuilieRomney for ANY reason, you are voting to send this nation farther and faster down the path to total government than anyone can possibly imagine. Yet you want to refer to people who support a candidate we can vote for without holding our noses as “paultards” and other names and wish that JimRob would ban people, some of whom have been here ten years or longer, based solely on that support.

You are no conservative, by any stretch of anyone’s most vivid imagination. I have no idea what you are; I do know what you are not.


245 posted on 01/14/2008 9:02:37 PM PST by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc
I have no idea what you are; I do know what you are not.

He is a bully, plain and simple. And the conservative movement of Reagan and Goldwater has simply been supplanted by bullies and people who love exercising state power especially against the weaker and more marginal elements of society.

246 posted on 01/14/2008 9:09:11 PM PST by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

To: dcwusmc

“Nor is it smaller government, vastly smaller taxation and spending.”

Your pet retard paul isn’t for smaller government or spending.

IF he ws for smaller spending then why did he put in $400 million dollars worth of earmarks into the budget?

Why did he request to have federal money fund what should have been state, local, or privately funded projects?

“Nor protecting the linchpin of ALL our God-given rights, the Second Amendment.”

Your pet retard paul isn’t for the 2nd Amendment either.

He’s all for allowing unlimited class action lawsuits against the gun manufacturers.

What you paul worshippers don’t understand is the anti-gun nuts are going to use the courts to file lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit until all the gun manufacturers, importers, and dealers in this country are put out of business.

paul is against measures to prevent the anti-gun nuts from going this route.

“Nor securing our borders.”

Your pet retard is against placing troops on the border.

“Nor even fighting the war against Jihadist terrorists.”

Your pet retard is against doing this also.

He has voted against every military budget since 1997.

He has voted against funding to provide our troops with body armor, MRAP vehicles, and anti-IED devices such as WARLOCK.

“You are no conservative, by any stretch of anyone’s most vivid imagination”

You’re not much of one either, so what’s your point?


273 posted on 01/15/2008 7:45:08 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (The next thing from the ron paullution supporters: Krystalnacht)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson