I'm certain that you've been paying attention.
From his writings in the 1990's to the strident financial and moral support from Don Black and his Brownshirts, to the numerous chapters of the KKK, to David Duke, to his Congressional votes. Not to mention his photographs with Don Black, Don Black and his son, etc.
Of course, his supporters have a breakdown when anyone points this out and try extremely hard to excuse his behavior (writings & his congressional votes) and to excuse his support from Neo-Nazis & white Supremacists, to no avail. Typically their defense of Run Paul consists of vilifying the person presenting the evidence and they trot out as "evidence" that Paul never really wrote the newsletters even though they were published under his name for months if not years.
His pronouncements on the support that he is receiving from these hate groups and avowed Jew-haters, have been insipid, to say the least. And those from his campaign have been laughable at best.
The simple fact is that when you lie with dogs, you get fleas. This money hungry excuse for an American is quite prepared to take donations and support from the most vile in our society but refuses to take responsibility for doing so.
The fact is that Paul is supported by many organizations that embrace Jew-hatred as a matter of policy. He is embraced by individuals who espouse the views of those organizations.
So, yes, there is evidence to support my assertion, evidence that his cult-like followers are blinded to. Perhaps because they share the same sentiments. Like I said, you lie with dogs ...
Sorry of you take offense to the statement but, frankly, I really don't give a rip.
Racism is one of the last things one might be able to accuse Ron Paul of being. Libertarian, yes, racism, no.
There are also lots of weirdos who support every other candidate out there. It’s a free country and they vote for whom they choose.
It hasn’t gone unnoticed that most candidates lack any ability to debate Ron Paul on the merits of his positions, so instead they attempt to reduce their politic to calling him weird for actually believing in the Constitution and voting his convictions, and not selling out to particular lobbyists who offer funds for the campaigns of anybody who will vote their interest.
I may not vote for Ron Paul, but I know no other candidate who has consistently for about 30 years voted his sincere beliefs and stated them plainly, and in strict compliance with the intent of our formally described Constitutional power structure. That is something I cannot say of any other politician I’ve seen in American politics over the past 20 years.
BTW, he doesn’t support the views of the KKK or other racist organizations, but he does support their Constitutional rights to form and express their beliefs, even though he disagrees with them in particular.
There are plenty of arguments against his positions without resorting to false accusations and false labels.