Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRESIDENTIAL TRIAL HEATS: WHO'S WEAKEST FOR G.O.P?
Townhall ^ | 1/13/08 | Michael Medved

Posted on 01/13/2008 5:43:00 PM PST by freespirited

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
I know, I know, you don't believe the polls. Well I think it's a mistake to ignore them. Especially when the purpose is to understand who is most likely to defeat the RAT candidate and who is least likely to do so.
1 posted on 01/13/2008 5:43:05 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

They are all pretty weak.


2 posted on 01/13/2008 5:43:58 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
John McCain, for instance, virtually ties both Obama and Clinton

If you ignore melanin and genitals, there's not much difference between them.

3 posted on 01/13/2008 5:44:58 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
This weekend, CNN...

Enough read.

4 posted on 01/13/2008 5:45:52 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

CNN? Not a legitimate pollster.


5 posted on 01/13/2008 5:45:52 PM PST by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"They are all pretty weak"

The Democrats certainly are. The GOP candidates are much stronger, each and every one of them.

Except Ron Paul.

6 posted on 01/13/2008 5:45:54 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I think Medved is right that it’s another warning against putting Mitt at the top of the ticket, but it’s also a case where the big dog that didn’t bark. That is they either didn’t poll or didn’t publish on the likely strongest candidate’s results: Fred, of course.


7 posted on 01/13/2008 5:46:58 PM PST by 9YearLurker (Fred just keeps looking better and better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

The problem with Romney is that he’s a Mormon. The GOP base won’t support a Mormon, and the Dems certainly won’t support one, particularly a Republican one.

Very sad in my view. I don’t think this race should be about religion. But it looks like it will be, and it looks like the determination of the GOP rank and file to vote based on religion is going to hand this to the Democrats.


8 posted on 01/13/2008 5:47:20 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

These head to heads mean nothing more than name recognition at this stage.


9 posted on 01/13/2008 5:47:36 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

10 posted on 01/13/2008 5:47:54 PM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1
CNN? Not a legitimate pollster.

LOL. CNN doesn't do the polling. They contract it out to a real polling firm.

11 posted on 01/13/2008 5:48:11 PM PST by freespirited (Still a proud member of the Stupid Party. It beats the Evil Party any day of the week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
John McCain, for instance, virtually ties both Obama and Clinton – running 48%-49%

What's the difference between losing 48-49, and losing 20-80?

If we have to nominate McCain to get up to 48%, and still lose, then is it worth it?

I don't think so.

Besides, I think O'bama and Clinton will chew each other up between now and July.

12 posted on 01/13/2008 5:48:34 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Exactly - bigger gaps than this have been overcome after both candidates were nominated.


13 posted on 01/13/2008 5:48:39 PM PST by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

This far before the election, this is measuring name ID and little else. Romney polls the weakest, because no one knows who he is. McCain, Giuliani and even Thompson are better known.

That said, I wish we could just pick “none of the above,” and start the process over.


14 posted on 01/13/2008 5:48:46 PM PST by B Knotts (If McCain wins, we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

I’d rather not let the MSM tell me who’s an electable republican..... if that’s ok with Wolf Blitzer.


15 posted on 01/13/2008 5:51:22 PM PST by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

The top 3 or 4 are running to see who gets the privilege of getting whooped in the general election.


16 posted on 01/13/2008 5:52:53 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The problem with Romney is that he’s a Mormon. The GOP base won’t support a Mormon, and the Dems certainly won’t support one, particularly a Republican one.Very sad in my view.

Indeed. Many people don't want to admit that Mitt being Mormon is one of the reasons they don't support him. They blame on his liberalism, flip-flop, etc. However, I don't think that is enough to explain his very high negative ratings. There are other Republican candidates with much worse records yet they don't receive that high of negative ratings. In one survey recently, they found 4% of Americans would not vote for a female for president, 2% would not vote for Black, and 14% would not vote for a Mormon.

17 posted on 01/13/2008 6:02:04 PM PST by paudio (Rose: I loath and despise money! Father: You also spend it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Two words, McCain-Feingold. Two more words, McCain-Kennedy.


18 posted on 01/13/2008 6:03:07 PM PST by claudiustg (You know it. I know it. I'm optiMITTstic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I fear that long-term socialism is truly coming to the U.S. soon.


19 posted on 01/13/2008 6:06:23 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

I agree. Be thinking about which foreign country you’ll flee to. I hear Costa Rica is nice.


20 posted on 01/13/2008 6:09:03 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson