Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Yes, I know the issue is “closing” Gitmo which means we have a few choices:

1) Release them;
2) Put them into the Federal prison system;
3) Put them into the Military Prison system;

or

4) Release them to their countries. It is my understanding that most countries do not want them back.

I am not fond of (2). Is there a Military Prison in the Alaskan Tundra? If not maybe we should build one. Obviously, 1) should not be an option, but considering the namby-pamby politicians we have put into power it wouldn’t surprise me, if I saw one of Gitmo's released prisoners walking down Michigan Avenue.

265 posted on 01/14/2008 7:54:26 AM PST by Chgogal (When you vote Democrat, you vote Al Qaeda! Ari Emanuel, Rahm's brother was agent to Moore's F9/11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: Chgogal

We should keep it open. The issue of this thread is whether the Chairman of the JCS went off the reservation with his statement that we should close it as soon as possible. If you read the entire article and see the caveats Mullen makes about the problems of closing Gitmo, he really isn’t saying anything different than Bush and Gates have been saying. This is a MSM attempt to create the impression of controversy within the Aministration where none really exists.


267 posted on 01/14/2008 8:17:21 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson