[calcowgirl]

I agree with you that you are not qualified to state an opinion.

I wouldn't comment on surgical procedures of the brain either. Some would.

Truer words were never spoken.

Grow up and take your snide comments elsewhere.

[fightinJAG]

You found yourself qualified to comment on the protest against a presidential candidate, why not against the Pope?

[fightinJAG]

I wouldn't comment on surgical procedures of the brain either.

You've spent quite a lot of time expounding on constitutional law issues and claiming that you know for a fact that the question you repeatedly asked on the "interrupt" comment was a "simple" "yes" or "no" question about which the law would not require the contemplation of any nuances, exceptions, factual pre-requisites, variances by venue and type and content of speech and so on.

How do you find commenting on protest causing a world leader (the Pope) to cancel a speech "commenting on surgical procedures of the brain," while you are perfectly comfortable commenting on protest causing a politician to cancel a speech?

Please explain. Because it really comes off as you wanting to avoid the fact that if your line of reasoning were applied to the Pope's situation, you wouldn't like the result nearly as much. But you tell me.