Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG
Maybe so, but this is not helpful for the cause of the pro-life movement. Sorry.

So, you would consider having a pro-abortion Democrat running against a pro-abortion Republican for president to be helpful to the pro-life movement?

52 posted on 01/13/2008 2:28:30 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

I believe that McCain, Mitt and Huck would all lose to Obama or Hillary in the general election.

Therefore, disrupting Rudy’s campaign means we will have a Democrat in the White House in 2008.

The law of unintended consequences...


67 posted on 01/13/2008 2:36:14 PM PST by KeithCu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Abortion is a bigger fight than just one election.

Classless acts like this convince the disinterested general public to whom abortion is a second tier issue at best that all pro-lifers are kooks they don’t want to associate with. And that characterization is going to be alive and well in their minds long after this one election.


99 posted on 01/13/2008 2:52:55 PM PST by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Sorry, but that’s one dumb question.

It’s pretty myopic to focus on simply who is running against whom.

It’s a bit more complex and comprehensive than that.


103 posted on 01/13/2008 2:54:50 PM PST by fightinJAG ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson