Please explain how you have concluded that I “seek to silence” the right to free speech.
That’s a quite serious charge and you owe your evidence on that.
Me (again): I am not debating with you the manner and method by which someone could be more effective or less effective in their speech. As I first mentioned in about post #44 or so, the right to speech is what is protected and which you seek to silence, unless it is according to YOUR personal preference.
I stand by these words, as well, your current deflection notwithstanding. See Calcowgirl's post #504; see also all posts to you concerning this matter up thread. They were to you, so it shouldn't be too difficult.