[nicmarlo]

That is all well and good if some people are having an effect on women not murdering babies.

But the murders, continue, by the millions, and with public moneis.

If others wish to take their speech to arenas that you don’t condone, who are you to dictate where and how they may deliver their message? In what way was the First Amendment written according to your personal ideals?

[khnyny]

I can’t believe I’m even bothering to reply, but I guess I’m assuming that you’re sincere. That may or may not be true.

The pro-life movement has to use their intellect and not rely on emotion. The only way to limit abortion using "public monies" is going through the system. Normal people rebel against fanaticism, violence, and strong arm tactics. Anti-abortion people may have the best intentions, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Do you know how abortion started and why? Margaret Sanger, an early proponent who started Planned Parenthood, wanted to cull the Negro race. It began as a social engineering experiment to eliminate “the undesirables”.

[fightinJAG]

If others wish to take their speech to arenas that you don’t condone, who are you to dictate where and how they may deliver their message? In what way was the First Amendment written according to your personal ideals?

The failure to condone equals "dictat[ing] where and how" a message may be delivered?

Only if you're the Dixie Chicks. You just keep digging that hole. Please, I really want to know how you conclude that the not condoning something is the same thing as dictating that it cannot be done.