If you’re talking about your blahblah at post 68, uh, I don’t think so.
But since you say you already “addressed” the “fire” issue, pray tell, how then are you sticking to your conclusion that the First Amendment is absolute and that there are no limits on protesting at political rallies?
I’ll try to keep up if you try to answer the questions put to you, k?
Not only are you a lawyer, you are a snake lawyer. Cite the post where I stated or intimated that. You cannot.
Then go to my post #133.