To: khnyny
Okay but see here is the thing. Once Reagan had the nomination what did Fred do. And frankly 1976 was a stupid thing to hold up. Reason being is that Ford was the Veep at the time and generally that is who you support.
The debate of who you supported in a primary is nonsense to bring to the table. I support fred. But i will support who ever has the nomination in the end.
49 posted on
01/13/2008 1:40:26 PM PST by
genxer
To: genxer
Actually, Ford was the PRESIDENT at the time. Secondly, Howard Baker is from Tennessee. I can cut Fred a little slack on those 2.
If the worse thing you can say about Fred is that he supported the wrong Republican 25-30 years ago, you are quite desperate!
55 posted on
01/13/2008 1:47:43 PM PST by
GLDNGUN
(Fred, White, and Blue!)
To: genxer
The debate of who you supported in a primary is nonsense to bring to the table. Remember that when the "Huckster" is the nominee.
To: genxer
I was actually referring to the Huckster.
61 posted on
01/13/2008 1:50:57 PM PST by
khnyny
(Clinton and Co. are the carnies of American politics.)
To: genxer
And frankly 1976 was a stupid thing to hold up. Reason being is that Ford was the Veep at the time and generally that is who you support.I agree with your defence of Fred, but actually, Ford was the President at the time and that is whom you generally support.
147 posted on
01/13/2008 2:39:20 PM PST by
BfloGuy
(It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
To: genxer
Actually, Ford was the incumbent president.
381 posted on
01/13/2008 6:19:18 PM PST by
murron
To: genxer
“Reason being is that Ford was the Veep at the time”
Check your history son. In 1976 Ford was the sitting incumbent president.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson