I am always amused that stating a candidates record is an attack.
So am I. The media promotes this by always calling ads that compare and contrast two candidates as "attack" ads.
How in the world is a candidate supposed to bring attention to differences between themselves and their opponents, if they are unable to point out those differences without being called "negative"?
I also am troubled by this in terms of Republicans taking this stance; as, this has always been a Democratic ploy when a Republican opponent points out their record on something.
Yep.... I mean either Thompson was registered as a foriegn agent and lobbied for foriegn countries or he didn’t....