Replies

“No, it’s because 2cav posted things that were demonstrably not true, then kept avoiding that point”

That’s another BS lie on your part.

“Rather than address the boston.com article in which Fred is quoted as saying he represented Aristide for free, 2 weeks after Aristide publicly talked about the sweet smell of necklacing opponents, he kept pointing back to some article he tied by 3 degrees of separation to an antiwar.com writer who I said I think is a whackjob.”

I did address the article but you want to keep whining so you can make a mountain out of a mole hill over one phone call, so that’s ANOTHER lie on your part.

But OMG Thompson didn’t bill anyone for the time to make ONE PHONE CALL....The outrage! /sarc

“To make matters worse, 2cav never acknowledged it - instead he said its OK, they were necklacing people from the Tonton Macoutes. Who cares? Aristide was the allegedly democratically elected leader, also an avowed marxist and voodoo nut, and Fred represented him for free - even though Aristide had just advocated extrajudicial justice. SO much for the rule of law, eh?”

I never said it was OK, so that’s lie number three on your part.

“That’s trolling if I ever heard of it!”

No cupcake, trolling is when someone like you lies about what is said. You have a track record of intentionally and underhandedly taking parts of what I say and using them out of context just to smear me.

“Now you’re misrepresenting the entire exchange on this thread. You have yet to condemn one person for namecalling, except me, and there is not one post of my doing that on this thread.”

And you’re not misrepresenting the exchange?

ROFLMAO!

“I don’t appreciate you stalking me from thread to thread, though.”

Allegra posted in this thread before you slithered in here chief.