Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: imahawk
I have seen the internals of those warbirds, and from that I see that we have different concepts of overbuilt.

To me, the B-17 was not overbuilt, it was built as designed for a life of (approx 25 missions). How thick were the skins, less than 0.020”?

You want to see overbuilt? :-) Then someday crawl thru the wings and bowels of a disrobed DC-8. What will ground the DC-8 though is the old 7075-T6 alloys and how they were made. Inter-granular corrosions causes them to ‘go poof’ (turn to powder) at some point

13 posted on 01/13/2008 1:24:51 PM PST by valkyry1 (Thompson/Hunter Hunter/Thompson all the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: valkyry1

The only skin on a 17 that is .020 is the nose back to frame three right forward of the cockpit.They were not designed to survive 25 missions but were expected to last 50 hours.Remember Boeing built it so it was built tough.None of the jets will be flying as long as a B-17.The oldest is 65 years and flying and the youngest is 63 years iold. I was thinking jets used 7075 T7351 because of the resistance to corrosion that T-7 offered.


14 posted on 01/13/2008 3:33:10 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: valkyry1

What about B-52’s. (the ones made by Boeing-not the ones with big hair)


16 posted on 01/13/2008 5:55:52 PM PST by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson