Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: murron

Fertilization IS conception. Conception IS fertilization. Any distinction between the two is an invention of the pro-abortion movement. They have worked hard to redefine “conception” as implantation.


27 posted on 01/12/2008 10:18:30 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan

Not really. If that is the case, then why not just call it conception? The way they describe fertilization in their literature seems to imply that first there is conception, then fertilization. They are using the term fertilization because it is what the AMA calls it. It is very misleading.

By not calling it conception, it could cause one to conclude that there are two different times in contention for the beginning of life: conception and fertilization.

I don’t know if you’re Catholic or not, but we Catholics have always called it the Immaculate Conception, not the Immaculate Fertilization.


33 posted on 01/12/2008 10:42:03 AM PST by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson