To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
I don’t see why he’d have to endorse anyone. Frankly, I hope he doesn’t as they are all pathetic. And stop with the Fred is a great conservative cr**. It’s not saying much with the rest of the field. But his main point of attraction with ‘electability’ is nothing but a myth because he will not win a general election.
8 posted on
01/12/2008 6:03:02 AM PST by
bushfamfan
(DUNCAN HUNTER '08: the only candidate whose record matches his talk.)
To: bushfamfan; 2CAVTrooper; wideawake
"I dont see why hed have to endorse anyone. Frankly, I hope he doesnt as they are all pathetic. And stop with the Fred is a great conservative cr**. Its not saying much with the rest of the field.But his main point of attraction with electability is nothing but a myth because he will not win a general election."
Hahahah. On another thread, 2cavtrooper and wideawake are calling me a Paultard and a Fred hater. BTW I agree with you though I think he might do it anyway. Some of Hunter's socon tendencies disappoint me - especially his weird bill about regulating porn on the internet and it's reporting requirements. Why not let parents do itif he believes in dindividual liberty and personal responsibility? Hunter has some nanny state tendencies and so does Fred. We need to clog the courts with 'indecency' cases'? Meh.
Maybe Hunter can endorse Paul. I said that because I didn't want to disappoint 2cav and wideawake, and so I can continue my record of pissing everyone off. ;)
And just yesterday 2cav said I have no sense of humor? It's just over your head, 2cav! ;) Not to mention dry and black like burnt toast.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson