1 posted on
01/11/2008 8:19:42 PM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I thought is was the phenomenon by which whomever Senator Bill Bradley endorsed-lost!
2 posted on
01/11/2008 8:25:02 PM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(Hillary Clinton: Cankles, Cackle, and Cuckold.)
To: neverdem
That guy said a whole lot of nothing.
To: neverdem; SierraWasp; calcowgirl
Pre-election polls showed Bradley, the mayor of Los Angeles, with a double-digit lead over his white opponent, George Deukmejian. But Bradley lost.....what happened was that the polls greatly underestimated the vote for the white candidates. Yes but in this case those extra "white voters" were good old boy gun owners. On the ballot with Bradley and Deukmejian was Proposition 15 a handgun ban. That measure drew out low propensity conservative voters in droves. Despite what the press want to believe, it wasn't about race.
6 posted on
01/11/2008 8:55:01 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired of all the politics in politics.)
To: neverdem
Women voted in unusually large numbers -- they outnumbered men at the polling places by 57 percent to 43 percent -- and they went heavily for Clinton over Obama. Especially those from Massachusetts and other states, the dead ones and the virtuals.
7 posted on
01/11/2008 8:56:20 PM PST by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
To: neverdem
Maybe they call it the “Bradley Effect” after the way he ran Los Angeles into the ground.
9 posted on
01/11/2008 9:04:56 PM PST by
Haddit
(Duncan Hunter)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson