Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CindyDawg

I know. I’m saying it should be though. >>>

It can’t, the IVF procedure would never work, and that is why many religions are against the procedure since more than one embryo is created during the procedure.


19 posted on 01/11/2008 6:00:49 PM PST by Coleus (Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Healthy New Year!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Coleus

Why couldn’t it work?


20 posted on 01/11/2008 6:03:02 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; wagglebee; Cicero

This procedure, cannot be compared in any way to a fertilized egg inside the womb, that is terminated through abortion. To believe otherwise is to completely ignore the reason for the procedure.

Without getting into pinhead mental exercises regarding this I reject the idea that anyone ought to be castigated or caused to feel shame for an act of killing because a fertilized egg does not take.

In fact I reject the idea that abortion itself is murder. That idea alone is what pro-choice folks fear most about pro-lifers and what perpetuates the abortion debate when it should have been resolved years ago.

The over the top, unbending, unchristian attitude of many pro-lifers does nothing to educate the public that the overwhelming majority of abortions are for financial and cosmetic reasons, and less than 1 percentage point relate in any way to rape incest or health of the mother! Some Mother who would knowingly end a pregnancy for money or IOW selfish reasons.

The State of SD made significant progress in the debate by doing a state wide study of abortions. The results of the study were made available to all parties.

The fact that some chose to ignore the study, and vote their emotions only proves that to some the scare tactics and leftist talking points though lies and deception, got more press than the facts in the study.

Can we say mainstream media bias. I believe the vote was basically 60/40 against. Not bad for the first state out of the blocks to end something that is a blight on the nation and it’s people. The IVF debate pales in comparison and my point is, there is no comparison.


29 posted on 01/11/2008 6:40:02 PM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; CindyDawg; wagglebee; airborne
It can’t, the IVF procedure would never work, and that is why many religions are against the procedure since more than one embryo is created during the procedure.

This is false. You can specifically request that two eggs be fertilized and be implanted at a time. Or just one. Yes, it costs more, probability-wise, but it doesn't mean you can't do it.

Dr. Laura Schlessinger has advocated this on her show as an alternative to the mass-destruction embryo method.

39 posted on 01/11/2008 10:32:36 PM PST by mbraynard (Tagline changed due to admin request)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson