And since the whole point of a sperm donor is getting the women pregnant,your bringing homosexuality and contraception into the the discussion strikes me as absurd.Unless of course,you were thinking of some other case,like two homosexual women having a baby with the help of an anonymous sperm donor.And there we are,right back to the selfish woman.
Labeling different opinions absurd doesn't make them so;I notice it is a favored tactic of socialists .
“And since the whole point of a sperm donor is getting the women pregnant,your bringing homosexuality and contraception into the the discussion strikes me as absurd.Unless of course,you were thinking of some other case,like two homosexual women having a baby with the help of an anonymous sperm donor.”
Nope, I was comparing your adultery comment to the comments of those, some of whom post on FR, feel that any time a man and a woman have sex without the possibility of creating a child, they are no better than homosexuals having sex. IMO, both are equally ridiculous.
“Labeling different opinions absurd doesn’t make them so;I notice it is a favored tactic of socialists.”
Here on FR we regularly label liberal opinions (and even some conservative opinions) as absurd. Are we socialists because of it?