“Oh, and Ron Paul is still a lying, fraudulent scumbag who claimed to be the author of those newsletters before deciding later that he didn’t write them.”
You’re the liar as I proved in post after post on this thread.
Posting broken links to unsubstantiated information isn't "proof" - at least to normal people.
What is true:
Ron Paul admitted in 1996 he wrote the newsletters.
Ron Paul claimed in 2001 that he didn't write them.
Ron Paul's campaign has refused to release copies of his own newsletter to the media.
Either Ron paul was lying in 1996 or he is lying now.
Please tell me which was the lie: the 1996 affirmation or the 2001 denial?
You still have not made any effort to address the issue at hand. Will you ever address the issue, or will you simply continue to deflect?